Since 2007, the company stored all videos in the H.264 format, but starting on May 19, when Google announced WebM, the company started storing all high-definition videos with 720p resolution or better with WebM as well. Playback issues are one problem, but Google has already decided to pay for dual codec support for its own infrastructure. But asked if it's likely to become that standard, given the backing of Mozilla and Google, he said, "If we have agreement from all the parties, yes, but there is more than just Mozilla and Google at the moment." WebM seems a good candidate," said Philippe Le Hegaret, who leads work for Web standards including HTML5, CSS, and SVG for the World Wide Web Consortium, in an interview last week. "We are looking for a royalty-free video format for HTML5. "We need all browsers to support a standard video format," Harding said. Safari, Chrome, and the the IE9 Platform Preview support a codec called H.264, while Mozilla, Opera, and Chrome are getting support for Google's new royalty-free WebM codec. What, exactly, is holding HTML5 video back?Īt the top of Harding's list is that browser makers haven't settled on a uniform video encoding technology, or codec, for HTML5. It's clear there's a tight alliance between Adobe and Google to back Flash, no doubt in part to try to paint Apple's ban of Flash from iPhones to look like a misstep that's bad for users and Web developers.īut it's not all about politics: in YouTube's case, there are real technical reasons for keeping Flash front and center. It just began a major push to spread Flash Player to mobile devices, where it's virtually unknown, and Google's Android is the first operating system to be supported. Google started showing some YouTube videos with HTML5 in January, but the program is still experimental.Īdobe is working hard to keep Flash relevant despite the threat from Web technologies and Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs' disparaging words about Flash. "Today, Adobe Flash provides the best platform for YouTube's video distribution requirements, which is why our primary video player is built with it." "While HTML5's video support enables us to bring most of the content and features of YouTube to computers and other devices that don't support Flash Player, it does not yet meet all of our needs," said YouTube programmer John Harding in a blog post Tuesday. Other open standards such as Cascading Style Sheets ( CSS) for formatting, Scalable Vector Graphics ( SVG), and Web Open Font Format ( WOFF) for typography can mimic Flash features, but Flash's ability to deliver streaming video to multiple browsers is one of the main reasons it's got such a strong incumbent advantage. One of the most important parts of the upcoming HTML5 standard is support for video that can be built directly into Web page without requiring a plug-in such as Flash Player. Lists Unordered Lists Ordered Lists Other Lists HTML Block & Inline HTML Classes HTML Id HTML Iframes HTML JavaScript HTML File Paths HTML Head HTML Layout HTML Responsive HTML Computercode HTML Semantics HTML Style Guide HTML Entities HTML Symbols HTML Emojis HTML Charset HTML URL Encode HTML vs.Google is among the biggest proponents of a collection of Web technologies that reproduce many important features of Adobe Systems' Flash, but it's not yet time for regime change at YouTube.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |